Raze provides website migration services for companies changing a CMS, frontend framework, hosting architecture, or domain. We inventory the current system, design the destination, transfer content and functionality, preserve search signals, and validate the live launch.
Share the current website, CMS, integrations, target platform, and reason for moving. We will identify the highest-risk dependencies before a 30-minute working session.
One migration plan for content, code, search, analytics, and launch.
Website migration services cover the complete public system, not just files or page templates. The migration plan assigns a destination to every valuable route, content type, asset, integration, and publishing responsibility.
Raze inventories crawlable URLs, templates, content types, assets, scripts, forms, analytics, integrations, redirects, environments, and the undocumented behavior teams rely on.
The target framework, CMS, route structure, component system, preview workflow, hosting model, and editorial responsibilities are defined against real source content.
Raze transfers structured content and media, rebuilds templates and components, reconnects forms and services, and validates references instead of assuming a successful import equals a usable website.
The launch includes URL mapping, permanent redirects, canonicals, metadata, schema, internal links, sitemap and robots outputs, analytics checks, live status validation, and post-launch crawl monitoring.
Migration risk hides in dependencies the visible sitemap does not show: legacy URLs, embedded forms, scripts, taxonomy pages, analytics events, CMS references, and editorial workarounds.
Taxonomy routes, assets, pagination, old campaign URLs, localized paths, and indexed CMS output can all carry traffic or links.
Rich text, references, nested fields, author data, SEO fields, and reusable blocks rarely map cleanly between two content systems.
Forms, analytics, consent, CRM routing, search, personalization, and scripts need owners and acceptance tests in the destination.
Search continuity also depends on canonicals, internal links, metadata, structured data, rendered content, sitemap membership, and correct status codes.
DNS, cache behavior, monitoring, rollback, editor access, production content, and verification should be designed before the destination is considered finished.
Inventory precedes architecture, and architecture precedes implementation. That order turns migration from a rushed rebuild into a testable transfer plan.
Crawl the public site, inspect the CMS and code, export content samples, map integrations, review analytics and search data, and document hidden dependencies.
Define the route map, content model, components, CMS workflow, integrations, redirect rules, deployment architecture, acceptance tests, and rollback conditions.
Build the destination, transform content and assets, reconnect functionality, compare source and destination records, and test production-shaped data before launch.
Deploy, verify the canonical domain, test redirects and critical journeys, submit the sitemap, inspect crawl and analytics data, and resolve live-only failures.
The migration is complete when the destination works for visitors, editors, search engines, analytics, and the team maintaining it. A successful import alone is not a finished migration.
Google documents site moves as a sequence of preparation, URL mapping, permanent redirects, monitoring, and continued verification rather than a one-time deployment.
Google recommends listing old URLs, mapping them to destination URLs, updating canonicals and internal links, and preparing the new sitemap before the move starts.
Source: Google Search CentralGoogle recommends server-side permanent redirects such as 301 or 308 when URLs change and advises sending each old URL directly to its relevant final destination.
Source: Google Search CentralGoogle states that significant site changes can cause temporary ranking fluctuations while pages are recrawled and reindexed, which is why post-launch monitoring is part of the migration.
Source: Google Search CentralThe output is a working destination website plus the route map, content model, redirect behavior, validation record, and launch monitoring needed to operate it safely.
Full inventory
Routes, content, assets, integrations, search signals, analytics, and editorial behavior documented before the build.
One architecture
Routes, content models, components, CMS responsibilities, integrations, and deployment rules designed together.
URL-level plan
Every valuable source URL is retained, redirected to a relevant destination, or deliberately retired with the correct response.
Live validation
Critical routes, forms, analytics, status codes, canonicals, metadata, schema, sitemaps, and crawl behavior checked in production.
The hub covers broad website migration intent. Platform-specific buyers should use the linked WordPress, Webflow, Next.js, and Sanity migration services.
The current platform slows publishing, integration, experimentation, performance, or engineering enough that the operating cost now exceeds the migration cost.
The site already has valuable rankings, backlinks, content, analytics history, or conversion paths that cannot be casually recreated after launch.
A durable migration needs decisions about who owns content models, code, deployments, redirects, integrations, and post-launch maintenance.
“I've worked with a lot of designers. Edin and Mergim are the only ones who never made me trade speed for quality. They shipped across GrowthX and our client work and never once became the bottleneck.”
Jason Gong, VP GTM
GrowthX
“We needed Docket to look like an AI company you'd trust, not another startup with a gradient and a promise. Raze got us there fast, stayed direct, and never let the project wander.”
Arun Lal, SVP of Marketing
Docket AI
“Edin and Mergim ran Emotive's marketing site for years. Not a one-off project, the actual site. It always looked a step ahead of where the company actually was, which is exactly what you want your website doing.”
Brian Zatulove, CEO
Emotive
“Raze rebuilt our site and it was the rare project where I never had to chase anyone. They understood the technical side, sweated the details, and shipped before I expected it.”
Ty Magnin, CEO
Animalz
Direct answers about website and CMS migration scope, SEO, redirects, content, analytics, timing, cost, and platform selection.
Website migration services move a public website from one CMS, framework, hosting setup, or domain to another while preserving the content, functionality, search signals, analytics, and editorial workflows the business still needs. Raze covers discovery, destination architecture, content and asset transfer, component development, integrations, SEO migration, launch, and monitoring.
A migration changes the underlying platform, content system, hosting, framework, domain, or route architecture. A redesign changes the message, structure, visual experience, and conversion path. They can happen together, but separating the two scopes makes risk, timeline, and acceptance criteria clearer.
Raze inventories indexed and linked URLs, preserves useful routes where possible, maps permanent redirects, rebuilds titles and descriptions, validates canonicals and structured data, updates internal links, generates sitemap and robots outputs, checks rendered content and status codes, and monitors the live crawl after launch.
Every valuable old URL needs an explicit decision, but not every URL should redirect. Equivalent or consolidated content should use a relevant permanent redirect. Removed content with no replacement should return an accurate 404 or 410 rather than redirecting every old page to the homepage.
Yes. Raze maps source content types and fields to the destination model, transforms rich text and references, transfers assets, validates record counts and required fields, and flags content that needs manual review. The exact method depends on the source CMS and destination architecture.
Timeline depends on unique templates, content volume, source quality, integrations, design changes, destination CMS work, and launch complexity. Raze provides a fixed timeline after the route inventory, content model, functionality, and validation requirements are documented.
Cost depends on the number of unique templates, content and asset volume, transformation complexity, integrations, editorial requirements, SEO risk, and whether a redesign is included. Raze fixes the price after the source and destination are documented instead of pricing from a page count alone.
Raze currently offers focused services for WordPress to Next.js, Webflow to Next.js, and WordPress to Sanity migrations. The broader website migration service covers discovery, platform decisions, hybrid migrations, domain changes, and scopes that combine CMS, framework, content, or hosting changes.
